OSCE Moscow Mechanism Mission Finds Accelerating, Systematic Russian Campaign to Militarize and Indoctrinate Ukrainian Children
Independent experts report to the OSCE Permanent Council
Independent experts report to the OSCE Permanent Council that Russia’s system of indoctrination and militarization has grown into a sophisticated operation at real scale and now reaches children from kindergarten age to high school in the occupied territories of Ukraine
VIENNA, 9 July 2026 — Stefan Wolff, Professor of International Security at the University of Birmingham and co-founder of Navigating the Vortex, was one of three independent experts appointed under the OSCE’s Moscow Mechanism — a process allowing OSCE participating States to launch independent human-rights investigations — to investigate the militarization and indoctrination of Ukrainian children by the Russian Federation. Today, alongside Prof. Hervé Ascensio (France) and Dr. Elīna Šteinerte (Latvia), he presented the mission’s findings to the OSCE Permanent Council: a systematic, accelerating Russian Federation policy to militarize and indoctrinate Ukrainian children in occupied territories and in Russia itself.
The mission was invoked on 14 May 2026 by 41 OSCE participating States. It was the sixth such expert mission on Ukraine since 2022 and was carried out by Prof. Wolff, Prof. Ascensio, and Dr. Šteinerte. Ukraine agreed to host the mission and cooperated fully, including facilitating an in-country visit from 6 to 11 June 2026 during which the experts met Ukrainian state institutions and civil society. The Russian Federation did not respond to the mission’s request for cooperation.
Key Findings at a Glance
• 20,610 children recorded by Ukraine’s Ministry of Justice as deported or forcibly transferred as of June 2026 — only 2,264 had been returned as of the same month.
• Membership of the Russian state-sponsored military-patriotic “Movement of the First” among children in the occupied territories has grown from around 60,000 in 2022 to more than 340,000 today — a nearly six-fold increase.
• Approximately 50,000 children a year are directed toward indoctrination and militarization “recreation camps,” including during school holidays.
• Russia’s militarization and indoctrination programmes now systematically target Ukrainian children from kindergarten age; a naval academy trains children as young as eight in drone operation.
• The mission found violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the Hague Regulations, and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child; concludes that Russia’s occupation practices may amount to crimes against humanity; and identifies probable war crimes, including torture, inhuman treatment, and unlawful deportation of children.
A System That Has Learned, Sped Up, and Expanded
The experts found that what began as an improvised, friction-laden occupation policy in Crimea after its 2014 annexation has become, within little more than a decade, a fast, well-resourced, and expanding system. Measures that took years to implement in Crimea — replacing the school curriculum, phasing out Ukrainian-language education, rolling out youth paramilitary structures — were imposed within weeks or months in territory occupied after the 2022 full-scale invasion.
The mission also documented the system’s current scale beyond the formal education system. Programmes such as “Eaglets of Russia” now reach children as young as kindergarten and elementary-school age. Government institutions from the Kremlin to the local level, the Russian Orthodox Church, and state-owned companies are directly involved in directing and funding indoctrination and militarization programmes aimed at Ukrainian children. Ukrainian children have also been documented at camps not only in Russia but also in Belarus and in North Korea.
Deportations and Unreturned Children
Ukraine’s Ministry of Justice recorded 20,610 children as deported or forcibly transferred as of June 2026; Ukrainian authorities report that only 2,264 had been returned as of the same month. The mission concluded that the low rate of return reflects a deliberate Russian policy of preventing family reunification, forming part of a broader effort to alter the identity of Ukrainian children in Russian hands.
Legal Findings
The mission concluded that Russia’s conduct violates international humanitarian law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention (on the protection of civilians) and the Hague Regulations (on occupation), and international human rights law, including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. It further found that the practices of systemic indoctrination and militarization may amount to a crime against humanity in the form of persecution, and endorsed prior findings that the forcible transfer and deportation of Ukrainian children may amount to the crime against humanity of deportation and forcible transfer of population, while also identifying probable war crimes including torture, inhuman treatment, and unlawful deportation of children.
Recommendations
The mission’s principal recommendation is that all stakeholders immediately, effectively, and meaningfully recognize the centrality of Ukrainian children’s safety, identity, and family life in the ongoing war and in any cease-fire or peace negotiations. It calls on the Russian Federation to halt all indoctrination and militarization practices, end coercion against children, parents, and teachers, facilitate the return of all deported children, and establish a mechanism for restoring their identity. It calls on Ukraine to continue strengthening documentation, return, reintegration, and rehabilitation systems, and calls on OSCE participating States and the wider international community to support accountability mechanisms and international cooperation to end impunity for crimes against Ukrainian children.
Ukraine’s Response
In formal comments transmitted together with the report, Ukraine welcomed the mission’s recommendations as a valuable and important basis for further action. Building on them, Ukraine set out further priority actions, including harmonizing the inter-agency methodology for recording deportation cases, expanding secure distance-learning opportunities for children in the occupied territories, introducing a unified long-term reintegration standard covering the child, the family, the school, and psychological and social services, extending sanctions to those directing and financing the transfer and “re-education” of children, continuing to submit evidence to the International Criminal Court and the Register of Damage for Ukraine, and seeking international access to the locations where Ukrainian children are held through the United Nations, UNICEF, the ICRC, and UNESCO.
“Russia isn’t running a static system. It’s an operation that has been learning, speeding up, and expanding for over a decade — and there is no sign that it is done or even slowing down,” said Prof. Stefan Wolff. “If anything, our findings show it is accelerating.”
About the Moscow Mechanism
The Moscow Mechanism, established in 1991 under the Document of the Moscow Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE (now OSCE), allows participating States to establish independent expert missions to investigate serious human rights concerns on the territory of a participating State. This is the sixth expert mission invoked in relation to Ukraine since 2022. The mission’s full report was submitted on 22 June 2026, formally transmitted to OSCE participating States by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) together with Ukraine’s comments (ODIHR.GAL/34/26, 6 July 2026), and presented to the OSCE Permanent Council in Vienna on 9 July 2026.
About Professor Stefan Wolff
Stefan Wolff is Professor of International Security in the Department of Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham, and co-founder of Navigating the Vortex. He is also a Senior Fellow at the Foreign Policy Centre and a Trustee and Honorary Treasurer of the UK’s Political Studies Association. He specialises in the management of contemporary security challenges, especially in the prevention and settlement of ethnic conflicts, in post-conflict state-building in deeply divided and war-torn societies, and in contemporary geopolitics and great-power rivalry. Wolff has extensive expertise in the post-Soviet space and has also worked on a wide range of other conflicts elsewhere, including in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa. With almost three decades of experience in UK higher education, Wolff has a publication record that includes over 100 journal articles and book chapters, as well as 24 books. He is the founding editor of Ethnopolitics and a regular international affairs contributor to The Conversation. He was one of three independent experts appointed to the Moscow Mechanism mission on the militarization and indoctrination of Ukrainian children, alongside Prof. Hervé Ascensio (University of Paris I) and Dr. Elīna Šteinerte (UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture).
Media Contact
Lucy Marcus
Co-founder, Navigating the Vortex
lucy.marcus@navigatingthevortex.com
Notes to Editors
• This release is issued by Navigating the Vortex. It is not an OSCE or ODIHR release; comment on behalf of the OSCE, ODIHR, or the mission’s other two experts should be sought directly from them.
• The mission’s full report runs to 143 pages, including annexes and the Government of Ukraine’s formal response, is available for download via the link at the bottom of this page.
• Prof. Wolff is available for interview. To arrange, please contact Lucy Marcus at lucy.marcus@navigatingthevortex.com.
• For broadcast bookings — TV chyron and Introduction and Radio introduction: “Professor of International Security, University of Birmingham, and co-founder of Navigating the Vortex.”
About Navigating the Vortex
Navigating the Vortex is a strategic analysis publication co-founded by Lucy Marcus and Stefan Wolff, covering Geopolitics & International Affairs, Corporate Governance & Stewardship, Markets & Economics, Leadership, Strategy & Power, Technology & AI, and ESG & Sustainability. Grounded in experience, written with rigour, and delivered with an ethical compass, the analysis draws on direct personal experience — boardroom, diplomatic, and academic — not produced at arm’s length from the world it covers. www.navigatingthevortex.com
###